1 |
/* |
2 |
* Written by Doug Lea with assistance from members of JCP JSR-166 |
3 |
* Expert Group and released to the public domain, as explained at |
4 |
* http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ |
5 |
*/ |
6 |
|
7 |
/** |
8 |
* A small toolkit of classes that support lock-free thread-safe |
9 |
* programming on single variables. In essence, the classes in this |
10 |
* package extend the notion of {@code volatile} values, fields, and |
11 |
* array elements to those that also provide an atomic conditional update |
12 |
* operation of the form: |
13 |
* |
14 |
* <pre> {@code boolean compareAndSet(expectedValue, updateValue);}</pre> |
15 |
* |
16 |
* <p>This method (which varies in argument types across different |
17 |
* classes) atomically sets a variable to the {@code updateValue} if it |
18 |
* currently holds the {@code expectedValue}, reporting {@code true} on |
19 |
* success. The classes in this package also contain methods to get and |
20 |
* unconditionally set values, as well as a weaker conditional atomic |
21 |
* update operation {@code weakCompareAndSet} described below. |
22 |
* |
23 |
* <p>The specifications of these methods enable implementations to |
24 |
* employ efficient machine-level atomic instructions that are available |
25 |
* on contemporary processors. However on some platforms, support may |
26 |
* entail some form of internal locking. Thus the methods are not |
27 |
* strictly guaranteed to be non-blocking -- |
28 |
* a thread may block transiently before performing the operation. |
29 |
* |
30 |
* <p>Instances of classes |
31 |
* {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean}, |
32 |
* {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger}, |
33 |
* {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong}, and |
34 |
* {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference} |
35 |
* each provide access and updates to a single variable of the |
36 |
* corresponding type. Each class also provides appropriate utility |
37 |
* methods for that type. For example, classes {@code AtomicLong} and |
38 |
* {@code AtomicInteger} provide atomic increment methods. One |
39 |
* application is to generate sequence numbers, as in: |
40 |
* |
41 |
* <pre> {@code |
42 |
* class Sequencer { |
43 |
* private final AtomicLong sequenceNumber |
44 |
* = new AtomicLong(0); |
45 |
* public long next() { |
46 |
* return sequenceNumber.getAndIncrement(); |
47 |
* } |
48 |
* }}</pre> |
49 |
* |
50 |
* <p>It is straightforward to define new utility functions that, like |
51 |
* {@code getAndIncrement}, apply a function to a value atomically. |
52 |
* For example, given some transformation |
53 |
* <pre> {@code long transform(long input)}</pre> |
54 |
* |
55 |
* write your utility method as follows: |
56 |
* <pre> {@code |
57 |
* long getAndTransform(AtomicLong var) { |
58 |
* long prev, next; |
59 |
* do { |
60 |
* prev = var.get(); |
61 |
* next = transform(prev); |
62 |
* } while (!var.compareAndSet(prev, next)); |
63 |
* return prev; // return next; for transformAndGet |
64 |
* }}</pre> |
65 |
* |
66 |
* <p>The memory effects for accesses and updates of atomics generally |
67 |
* follow the rules for volatiles, as stated in |
68 |
* <a href="https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se8/html/jls-17.html#jls-17.4"> |
69 |
* Chapter 17 of |
70 |
* <cite>The Java™ Language Specification</cite></a>: |
71 |
* |
72 |
* <ul> |
73 |
* |
74 |
* <li>{@code get} has the memory effects of reading a |
75 |
* {@code volatile} variable. |
76 |
* |
77 |
* <li>{@code set} has the memory effects of writing (assigning) a |
78 |
* {@code volatile} variable. |
79 |
* |
80 |
* <li>{@code lazySet} has the memory effects of writing (assigning) |
81 |
* a {@code volatile} variable except that it permits reorderings with |
82 |
* subsequent (but not previous) memory actions that do not themselves |
83 |
* impose reordering constraints with ordinary non-{@code volatile} |
84 |
* writes. Among other usage contexts, {@code lazySet} may apply when |
85 |
* nulling out, for the sake of garbage collection, a reference that is |
86 |
* never accessed again. |
87 |
* |
88 |
* <li>{@code weakCompareAndSet} atomically reads and conditionally |
89 |
* writes a variable but does <em>not</em> |
90 |
* create any happens-before orderings, so provides no guarantees |
91 |
* with respect to previous or subsequent reads and writes of any |
92 |
* variables other than the target of the {@code weakCompareAndSet}. |
93 |
* |
94 |
* <li>{@code compareAndSet} |
95 |
* and all other read-and-update operations such as {@code getAndIncrement} |
96 |
* have the memory effects of both reading and |
97 |
* writing {@code volatile} variables. |
98 |
* </ul> |
99 |
* |
100 |
* <p>In addition to classes representing single values, this package |
101 |
* contains <em>Updater</em> classes that can be used to obtain |
102 |
* {@code compareAndSet} operations on any selected {@code volatile} |
103 |
* field of any selected class. |
104 |
* |
105 |
* {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater}, |
106 |
* {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater}, and |
107 |
* {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLongFieldUpdater} are |
108 |
* reflection-based utilities that provide access to the associated |
109 |
* field types. These are mainly of use in atomic data structures in |
110 |
* which several {@code volatile} fields of the same node (for |
111 |
* example, the links of a tree node) are independently subject to |
112 |
* atomic updates. These classes enable greater flexibility in how |
113 |
* and when to use atomic updates, at the expense of more awkward |
114 |
* reflection-based setup, less convenient usage, and weaker |
115 |
* guarantees. |
116 |
* |
117 |
* <p>The |
118 |
* {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicIntegerArray}, |
119 |
* {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLongArray}, and |
120 |
* {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReferenceArray} classes |
121 |
* further extend atomic operation support to arrays of these types. |
122 |
* These classes are also notable in providing {@code volatile} access |
123 |
* semantics for their array elements, which is not supported for |
124 |
* ordinary arrays. |
125 |
* |
126 |
* <p id="weakCompareAndSet">The atomic classes also support method |
127 |
* {@code weakCompareAndSet}, which has limited applicability. On some |
128 |
* platforms, the weak version may be more efficient than {@code |
129 |
* compareAndSet} in the normal case, but differs in that any given |
130 |
* invocation of the {@code weakCompareAndSet} method may return {@code |
131 |
* false} <em>spuriously</em> (that is, for no apparent reason). A |
132 |
* {@code false} return means only that the operation may be retried if |
133 |
* desired, relying on the guarantee that repeated invocation when the |
134 |
* variable holds {@code expectedValue} and no other thread is also |
135 |
* attempting to set the variable will eventually succeed. (Such |
136 |
* spurious failures may for example be due to memory contention effects |
137 |
* that are unrelated to whether the expected and current values are |
138 |
* equal.) Additionally {@code weakCompareAndSet} does not provide |
139 |
* ordering guarantees that are usually needed for synchronization |
140 |
* control. However, the method may be useful for updating counters and |
141 |
* statistics when such updates are unrelated to the other |
142 |
* happens-before orderings of a program. When a thread sees an update |
143 |
* to an atomic variable caused by a {@code weakCompareAndSet}, it does |
144 |
* not necessarily see updates to any <em>other</em> variables that |
145 |
* occurred before the {@code weakCompareAndSet}. This may be |
146 |
* acceptable when, for example, updating performance statistics, but |
147 |
* rarely otherwise. |
148 |
* |
149 |
* <p>The {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicMarkableReference} |
150 |
* class associates a single boolean with a reference. For example, this |
151 |
* bit might be used inside a data structure to mean that the object |
152 |
* being referenced has logically been deleted. |
153 |
* |
154 |
* The {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicStampedReference} |
155 |
* class associates an integer value with a reference. This may be |
156 |
* used for example, to represent version numbers corresponding to |
157 |
* series of updates. |
158 |
* |
159 |
* <p>Atomic classes are designed primarily as building blocks for |
160 |
* implementing non-blocking data structures and related infrastructure |
161 |
* classes. The {@code compareAndSet} method is not a general |
162 |
* replacement for locking. It applies only when critical updates for an |
163 |
* object are confined to a <em>single</em> variable. |
164 |
* |
165 |
* <p>Atomic classes are not general purpose replacements for |
166 |
* {@code java.lang.Integer} and related classes. They do <em>not</em> |
167 |
* define methods such as {@code equals}, {@code hashCode} and |
168 |
* {@code compareTo}. (Because atomic variables are expected to be |
169 |
* mutated, they are poor choices for hash table keys.) Additionally, |
170 |
* classes are provided only for those types that are commonly useful in |
171 |
* intended applications. For example, there is no atomic class for |
172 |
* representing {@code byte}. In those infrequent cases where you would |
173 |
* like to do so, you can use an {@code AtomicInteger} to hold |
174 |
* {@code byte} values, and cast appropriately. |
175 |
* |
176 |
* You can also hold floats using |
177 |
* {@link java.lang.Float#floatToRawIntBits} and |
178 |
* {@link java.lang.Float#intBitsToFloat} conversions, and doubles using |
179 |
* {@link java.lang.Double#doubleToRawLongBits} and |
180 |
* {@link java.lang.Double#longBitsToDouble} conversions. |
181 |
* |
182 |
* @since 1.5 |
183 |
*/ |
184 |
package java.util.concurrent.atomic; |