126 |
|
* op.apply(array[lo]); |
127 |
|
* tryComplete(); |
128 |
|
* } |
129 |
< |
* } }</pre> |
129 |
> |
* }}</pre> |
130 |
|
* |
131 |
|
* This design can be improved by noticing that in the recursive case, |
132 |
|
* the task has nothing to do after forking its right task, so can |
291 |
|
* return new MapReducer<E>(null, array, mapper, reducer, |
292 |
|
* 0, array.length).invoke(); |
293 |
|
* } |
294 |
< |
* } }</pre> |
294 |
> |
* }}</pre> |
295 |
|
* |
296 |
|
* Here, method {@code onCompletion} takes a form common to many |
297 |
|
* completion designs that combine results. This callback-style method |