ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Download File | Root Listing
root/jsr166/jsr166/src/main/intro.html
(Generate patch)

Comparing jsr166/src/main/intro.html (file contents):
Revision 1.9 by dl, Tue Aug 5 14:36:04 2003 UTC vs.
Revision 1.21 by jsr166, Sun Nov 18 18:03:10 2012 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML//EN">
2   <html>
3   <head>
4 <   <title>JSR 166 Community Review Draft Introduction.</title>
4 >   <title>JSR 166 Introduction.</title>
5    </head>
6  
7    <body bgcolor="#ffffee" vlink="#0000aa" link="#cc0000">
8 <  <h1>JJSR 166 Community Review Draft Introduction.</h1>
8 >  <h1>JSR 166 Introduction.</h1>
9  
10    by <a href="http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl">Doug Lea</a>
11    <p>
12  
13 < To chack for updates to this draft, access a preliminary prototype
14 < release of main functionality, or join a mailing list discussing this
15 < JSR, go to: <A
13 > This is maintenance repository of JSR166 specifications.  For further
14 > information, go to: <A
15   HREF="http://altair.cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest">
16 < http://altair.cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest</A>
18 < .
19 < <p>
20 <
21 < <em> <b>Disclaimer</b>. The prototype implementation is experimental
22 < code developed as part of JCP JSR-166 is made available to the
23 < developer community for use as-is. It is not a supported product. Use
24 < it at your own risk. The specification, language and implementation
25 < are subject to change as a result of your feedback. Because these
26 < features have not yet been approved for addition to the Java language,
27 < there is no schedule for their inclusion in a product.  </em>
28 <
29 < <p> <em> <b>Disclaimer</b>.  This draft specification was produced
30 < using JDK1.4 tools plus some preprocessing. The resulting javadocs do
31 < not yet correctly render other planned JDK1.5 constructs on which
32 < JSR-166 relies, most notably the use of generic types. We are
33 < releasing this version now (before the availability of JDK1.5-based
34 < tools) because, even though they are misformatted and sometimes lack
35 < proper cross-referencing, they otherwise convey the intended
36 < specifications.  </em>
16 > http://altair.cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest</A>.
17  
18 < <p> JSR-166 introduces package <tt>java.util.concurrent</tt>
18 > <p><em>Note: The javadocs here do <em>not</em> include pre-existing
19 > java classes (for example <tt>java.lang.Thread</tt>) that were changed
20 > as part of the JSR166 spec.  On the other hand, the javadocs here do
21 > include some existing java.util Collection interfaces and classes that
22 > are not part of the spec, but are included because some new methods
23 > implement or inherit from their specifications.
24 > </em>
25 >
26 > <p>JSR-166 introduces package <tt>java.util.concurrent</tt>
27   containing utility classes commonly useful in concurrent
28   programming. Like package <tt>java.util</tt>, it includes a few small
29 < standardized extensible frameworks, as well as some classes that
29 > standardized extensible frameworks, as well as other classes that
30   provide useful functionality and are otherwise tedious or difficult to
31   implement.
32  
# Line 50 | Line 38 | data structures, to high-level execution
38   pools. This diversity reflects the range of contexts in which
39   developers of concurrent programs have been found to require or desire
40   support not previously available in J2SE, which also keeping the
41 < resulting package small; providing only that minimial support for
42 < which it makes sense to standardize.
41 > resulting package small; providing only functionality that has been
42 > found to be worthwhile to standardize.
43  
44   <p>Descriptions and brief motivations for the main components may be
45   found in the associated package documentation.  JSR-166 also includes
# Line 68 | Line 56 | java.util.PriorityQueue} is added.
56  
57   <h2>Threads</h2>
58  
59 < Two minor changes are introduced to the {@link java.lang.Thread}
60 < class: It now allows per-thread installation of handlers for uncaught
61 < exceptions. Ths optionally disassociates handlers from ThreadGroups,
62 < which has proven to be too inflexible. (Note that the combination of
63 < features in JSR-166 make ThreadGroups even less likely to be used in
64 < most programs. Perhaps they will eventually be deprecated.) Secondly,
65 < access checks are no longer required when a Thread interrupts
66 < <em>itself</em>.  The <tt>interrupt</tt> method is the only way to
67 < re-assert a thread's interruption status (and in the case of
68 < self-interruption has no other effect than this).  The check here
69 < previously caused unjustifiable and uncontrollable failures when
70 < restricted code invoked library code that must reassert interruption
71 < to correctly propagate status when encountering some
72 < <tt>InterruptedExceptions</tt>.
59 > Three minor changes are introduced to the {@link java.lang.Thread}
60 > class:
61 > <ul>
62 >  <li> It now allows per-thread installation of handlers for uncaught
63 >  exceptions. Ths optionally disassociates handlers from ThreadGroups,
64 >  which has proven to be too inflexible. (Note that the combination of
65 >  features in JSR-166 make ThreadGroups even less likely to be used in
66 >  most programs. Perhaps they will eventually be deprecated.)
67 >
68 >  <li> Access checks are no longer required when a Thread interrupts
69 >  <em>itself</em>.  The <tt>interrupt</tt> method is the only way to
70 >  re-assert a thread's interruption status (and in the case of
71 >  self-interruption has no other effect than this).  The check here
72 >  previously caused unjustifiable and uncontrollable failures when
73 >  restricted code invoked library code that must reassert interruption
74 >  to correctly propagate status when encountering some
75 >  <tt>InterruptedExceptions</tt>.
76 >  <li> The <tt>destroy</tt> method, which has never been implemented,
77 >  has finally been deprecated. This is just a spec change, reflecting
78 >  the fact that that the reason it has never been implemented is that
79 >  it was undesirable and unworkable.
80 > </ul>
81  
82   <h2>Timing</h2>
83  
# Line 98 | Line 94 | designs.
94  
95  
96    <hr>
101  <address><A HREF="http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl">Doug Lea</A></address>
97   </body>
98   </html>

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines