/* * Written by Doug Lea with assistance from members of JCP JSR-166 * Expert Group and released to the public domain. Use, modify, and * redistribute this code in any way without acknowledgement. */ package java.util.concurrent; /** * A ReadWriteLock maintains a pair of associated * {@link Locks locks}. * The {@link #readLock read lock} may be held simultaneously by multiple * reader threads, so long as there are no writers. * The {@link #writeLock write lock} is exclusive. * *

A read-write lock allows for a greater level of concurrency in * accessing shared data, than that permitted by a mutual exclusion lock. * It exploits the fact that while only a single thread at a time (a * writer thread) can modify the shared data, in many cases any * number of threads can concurrently read the data (hence reader * threads). * In theory, the increase in concurrency permitted by the use of a read-write * lock will lead to performance improvements over the use of a mutual * exclusion lock. In practice this increase in concurrency will only be fully * realized on a multi-processor, and then only if the access patterns for * the shared data are suitable. * *

Whether or not a read-write lock will improve performance over the use * of a mutual exclusion lock depends on the frequency that the data is * read compared to being modified, the duration of the read and write * operations, and the contention for the data - that is, the number of * threads that will try to read or write the data at the same time. * For example, a collection that is initially populated with data and * thereafter infrequently modified, whilst being frequently searched * (such as a directory of some kind) is an ideal candidate for the use of * a read-write lock. However, if updates become frequent then the data * spends most of its time being exclusively locked and there is little, if any * increase in concurrency. Further, if the read operations are too short * the overhead of the read-write lock implementation (which is inherently * more complex than a mutual exclusion lock) can dominate the execution * cost, particularly as many read-write lock implementations still serialize * all threads through a small section of code. Ultimately, only profiling * and measurement will establish whether the use of a read-write lock is * suitable for your application. * * *

Although the basic operation of a read-write lock is straight-forward, * there are many policy decisions that an implementation must make, which * may affect the effectiveness of the read-write lock in a given application. * Examples of these policies include: *

* You should consider all of these things when evaluating the suitability * of a given implementation for your application. * * @see ReentrantReadWriteLock * @see Lock * @see ReentrantLock * * @since 1.5 * @spec JSR-166 * @revised $Date: 2003/05/27 18:14:40 $ * @editor $Author: dl $ */ public interface ReadWriteLock { /** * Return the lock used for reading. **/ public Lock readLock(); /** * Return the lock used for writing. **/ public Lock writeLock(); }